linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mpetlan@redhat.com
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	vince@deater.net, dvyukov@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:37:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225040724.GA25658@dhcppc3.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160224160241.GU6375@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Hi Peter,

On 24/02/2016:05:02:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:02:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > FWIW, it would be nice to have a similar test for:

+ Michael, (C Test case for following proposed test case is at the end)

> > 
> > 	attr = {
> > 		.disabled = true;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	sys_perf_event_open(&attr, .pid = self);
> > 
> > 	if (attr.disabled)
> > 		ioctl(ENABLE);
> > 
> > 	/* generate N events */
> > 
> > 	ioctl(DISABLE);
> > 
> > 	read();
> > 
> > 	/* print event cnt and scale factors */
> > 
> > and one that has .disabled = false.
> 
> 
> root@ivb-ep:~/perf# ./main 
> 1000000903 218851613 218851613
> root@ivb-ep:~/perf# ./main 1
> 1000000235 218981231 218981231
> 
> 
> Appears to work...

Thanks, Picked patches from your new series and it worked :-)

# perf stat -x';' -e 'probe_exact:*' examples/exact_counts  
65535;;probe_exact:f_65535x;85984820;100.00
997;;probe_exact:f_997x;85984820;100.00
103;;probe_exact:f_103x;85984820;100.00
3;;probe_exact:f_3x;85984820;100.00
2;;probe_exact:f_2x;85984820;100.00
1;;probe_exact:f_1x;85984820;100.00

~Pratyush

> 
> ---
> 
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <stdarg.h>
> 
> #include "perf.h"
> 
> static struct perf_event_attr perf_attr = {
> 	.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> 	.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS,
> 	.read_format = PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED |
> 		       PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING,
> 	.exclude_kernel = 1,
> 	.pinned = 1,
> };
> 
> void die(const char *err, ...)
> {
> 	va_list params;
> 
> 	va_start(params, err);
> 	vfprintf(stderr, err, params);
> 	va_end(params);
> 
> 	exit(-1);
> }
> 
> int main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> 	u64 val[3];
> 	int i, fd;
> 
> 	perf_attr.disabled = argc > 1;
> 
> 	fd = sys_perf_event_open(&perf_attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> 	if (fd < 0)
> 		die("failed to create perf_event");
> 
> 	if (perf_attr.disabled)
> 		ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0);
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {
> 		asm volatile ("nop\n\r"
> 			      "nop\n\r"
> 			      "nop\n\r"
> 			      "nop\n\r"
> 			      "nop\n\r"
> 			      "nop\n\r"
> 			      "nop\n\r");
> 	}
> 
> 	ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0);
> 
> 	read(fd, &val, sizeof(val));
> 
> 	printf("%Lu %Lu %Lu\n", val[0], val[1], val[2]);
> 
> 	return 0;
> }

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-25  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-19 14:37 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] perf: more fuzzer inspired patches Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] perf: Close install vs exit race Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] perf: Do not double free Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] perf: Allow perf_release() with !event->ctx Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 15:48     ` Jiri Olsa
2016-02-23 16:35       ` Pratyush Anand
2016-02-23 17:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 11:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 14:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 16:02               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  4:07                 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-02-23 21:44       ` Jiri Olsa
2016-02-26  2:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] perf: Fix cloning Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: Fix race between event install and jump_labels Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf: Cure event->pending_disable race Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160225040724.GA25658@dhcppc3.redhat.com \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).