Re: [lkp] [printk] 34578dc67f: EIP is at vprintk_emit+0x1ea/0x600

Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-24T15:14:45Z

On (02/24/16 21:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (02/24/16 12:46), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > and you get the NMI watchdog softlockup because you have a whole bunch of
> > >
> > > "of_overlay_destroy: Could not find overlay #6"
> > > "### dt-test ### of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays: overlay destroy failed for #6"
> > >
> > > messages to print. seems that somehitng just pushes them in a loop.
> > > there are too many of them:
> >
> > This sounds like a reasonable explanation. It seems that
> > of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays() really ended in an infinite
> > loop.
> >
> > But I am still curious why the softlookup points to
> >
> > [ 33.497718] EIP is at vprintk_emit+0x1ea/0x600
> >
> > Also there is on the stack
> >
> > [ 33.497741] [<c068e712>] vprintk_default+0x32/0x40
> > [ 33.497741] [<c068e712>] vprintk_default+0x32/0x40
> > [ 33.497744] [<c06fdf6e>] printk+0x11/0x13
> > [ 33.497744] [<c06fdf6e>] printk+0x11/0x13
> > [ 33.497748] [<c0df5eec>] of_unittest_overlay+0x8d1/0x900
> > [ 33.497748] [<c0df5eec>] of_unittest_overlay+0x8d1/0x900
> > [ 33.497750] [<c0df6b1f>] of_unittest+0xc04/0xc2d
> > [ 33.497750] [<c0df6b1f>] of_unittest+0xc04/0xc2d
> >
> > I would expect that the soft lookup happens in console_unlock()
> > called with IRQs disabled. It seems to me that of_unittest_overlay()
> > is called with IRQs enabled.

hm... both of the logbuf_lock/irq reqions in vprintk_emit/console_unlock
are not modified by the patch set. there is, however, one thing that has
changed -- additional console_cont_flush() calls, which does spin_lock_irq
logbuf_lock and spin_unlock_irq logbuf_lock.

> > I want to be sure that the patch in printk() did not introduce
> > a deadlock that is visible only under a high printk load.

I'll do more tests, certainly.

-ss