From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about prio_changed_dl()
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:25:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225152558.2fbac9e5@utopia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160225140149.GK6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:01:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
[...]
> > so, prio_changed_dl() invokes switched_to_dl() if
> > task_on_rq_queued() is false, but in this case switched_to_dl()
> > does nothing... Am I missing something, or the
> > } else
> > switched_to_dl(rq, p);
> > is useless?
>
> Agreed, see below.
>
> > (BTW, it seems to me that switched_to_dl() is never invoked, for
> > some reason...)
>
> Hmm, it should be invoked if you do sched_setattr() to get
> SCHED_DEADLINE.
Sorry, that was me being confused...
It is prio_changed_dl() that is not invoked when the deadline
parameters are changed (I am testing a change to fix this - it actually
is included in the "Move the remaining __dl_{sub,add}_ac() calls from
core.c to deadline.c" patch I posted on Monday; I am going to extract
it in a separate patch).
switched_to_dl() is correctly invoked.
>
> ---
> Subject: sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl()
This is what I was thinking about, yes :)
Thanks,
Luca
>
> if (A || B) {
>
> } else if (A && !B) {
>
> }
>
> If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the
> second. Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> Reported-by: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 57b939c81bce..c161c53d9424 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1768,8 +1768,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq,
> struct task_struct *p, */
> resched_curr(rq);
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> - } else
> - switched_to_dl(rq, p);
> + }
> }
>
> const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 12:43 Question about prio_changed_dl() luca abeni
2016-02-25 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 14:16 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-25 14:25 ` luca abeni [this message]
2016-02-25 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-27 11:37 ` luca abeni
2016-03-02 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02 20:16 ` luca abeni
2016-03-02 20:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-04 8:50 ` luca abeni
2016-02-29 11:19 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160225152558.2fbac9e5@utopia \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).