From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933278AbcBYQrg (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:47:36 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:37803 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760521AbcBYQrf (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:47:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:47:29 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Wang Nan , Daniel Borkmann , Brendan Gregg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf: generalize perf_callchain Message-ID: <20160225164729.GS6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1455767939-2700534-1-git-send-email-ast@fb.com> <1455767939-2700534-2-git-send-email-ast@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455767939-2700534-2-git-send-email-ast@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:58:57PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > +static inline int perf_callchain_store(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, u64 ip) > { > + if (entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) { > entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip; > + return 0; > + } else { > + return -1; /* no more room, stop walking the stack */ > + } > } Why 0 and -1 ? What's wrong with something like: static inline bool perf_callchain_store(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, u64 ip) { if (entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) { entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip; return true; } return false; }