From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933631AbcBYT00 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:26:26 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:53971 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933576AbcBYT0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:26:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:25:48 -0800 From: Maxime Ripard To: Andre Przywara Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] arm64: Introduce Allwinner A64 and Pine64 support Message-ID: <20160225192548.GK4736@lukather> References: <1456165255-31013-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <56CED1CB.8040807@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lZZ4ablUVnt2XgAh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56CED1CB.8040807@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --lZZ4ablUVnt2XgAh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:04:59AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Maxime, >=20 > can you give me a quick assessment on how we can progress from here? >=20 > Is it already too late for at least some of the patches to go into 4.6? I think we still have a major disagreement on the clocks part, and yeah, it's too late for 4.6, I'm going to send the PR tomorrow, and am merging the final patches that didn't have the attention they deserved lately. > If not, can you at least merge the Kconfig patch (3/10) This one was already merged > and the pinctrl driver (if that goes via your tree at all)? Do you > need more reviews or Acks? And I just gave my Acked-by for this one, but it will go through the pinctrl tree, hopefully in time. > Of the prerequisite patches for a clean arm64 compile I see that the > sunxi-rsb is in your for-next branch, but not in -next itself. Also I > got a message about the sunxi-ss Kconfig patch to be applied, but cannot > find it in -next either. All the other patches have made it into -next > as of today. Great, I'll push the A64 kconfig patch in next today, and see if there's any fallout. > Also are you happy with the PLL6 reuse patch I sent on Monday and can I > base the A64's PLL7 clock on that? > Or do you prefer another approach here? I am happy to discuss this on > the list then. I just commented on it. Sorry for the unresponsiveness lately, Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --lZZ4ablUVnt2XgAh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWz1U7AAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgczkQAJ8PKsSUAGBl3UDdWFFmpBOH XP55TVE0OLB9HDswJdoID/suThOSwQV8jrikxKs2G38BtFpgzXYc/UJtSeQ1S7oh VHDWc1c3RCrCxVxPZrGAZaFn/ZWQlpKmUeC5tOsBl8lNwKCCVFvljxxAZXb/Mc8+ PNk+/jh36HX7j0min/pCXgqb+v8D4qc4hSrrReHiGSDFzgJHdRe8SjlrWgvi4LYk Y7RMoFn2riWKTtP7vwcnXbOihvsLnngusZEGMf4UjWw0We6vKx7Jzoj4Exn/EGhH s40AsHyy/5g5GmSeZbOlILF63W3zmmoiA3a5K4KkWpsTw9VQaP3FQSYT7EnZuWky NmI7oe17r1DaWoxA3pG1J/Pc5Br+XeRhTH1wfc022Oj8oXYnK/GFws/3R7lvFwJW fcD4EvrPHhg8dkJC6DoF/b6zEfqEHWl5cFqjvGZDhumqEUS7o30wz1F2GFpEqmNv feGwa4qG0FzVa5XVDcQciRwiotH+u0IOH+BP9X+NF2SfChqIBGm9df8YVmiAxkmR Scp7dA1rN5QFzVvYG9MXo60WL3JCvD/MEJXOVbhamSf5fiCgctQaP4AfHuI8z6FV DecNj1DXlWtJWujmnLTgfBDqPIyXs6JR+Q/MweALsnHyRvoKw2AISXCgc5lfRjG1 3ArdonHq2frAyhZNK1x+ =byXA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lZZ4ablUVnt2XgAh--