public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:07:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225210715.GA8948@test-lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CF6AB8.1050803@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:57:28PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 02/25/2016 12:26 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > Patch 9 re-enables XSAVES.
> 
> Could we also add one more thing to this: A big, fat warning that
> supervisor states are not supported?  We might get that from an eventual
> use of xfeature_uncompacted_offset(), but we need something that's very
> clear.
> 
> I just don't want somebody coming along and shoving a supervisor state
> in to XCR0 and expecting it to work just because we have XSAVES support
> itself.  That might happen in-tree or out-of-tree as things get prototyped.

I will do that.

Yu-cheng

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-25 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-25 20:26 [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] x86/xsaves: Define and use user_xstate_size for xstate size in signal context Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86/xsaves: Rename xstate_size to kernel_xstate_size to explicitly distinguish xstate size in kernel from user space Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] x86/xsaves: Keep init_fpstate.xsave.header.xfeatures as zero for init optimization Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/xsaves: Introduce a new check that allows correct xstates copy from kernel to user directly Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/xsaves: Align xstate components according to CPUID Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86/xsaves: Supervisor state component offset Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] x86/xsaves: Fix PTRACE frames for XSAVES Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] x86/xsaves: Fix XSTATE component offset print out Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2016-02-25 21:03     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-25 20:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen
2016-02-25 21:07   ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160225210715.GA8948@test-lenovo \
    --to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox