public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:10:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227001042.GC28849@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CFA8B4.7070600@rock-chips.com>

On 02/26, Shawn Lin wrote:
> On 2016/2/26 7:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 02/18, Shawn Lin wrote:
> >>set_phase does sanity checking of degree and ask sub-driver
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>already there.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> >>
> >>---
> >
> >Knee jerk reaction is why does the provider code set a phase that
> >isn't requested? Do we need some sort of clk_round_phase() API
> >that parallels clk_round_rate() so that drivers know what phase
> >they're going to get? Or do drivers not care what phase they get
> >when they call clk_set_phase()?
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> drivers should care what phase they get when calling clk_set_phase(i.e
> the drivers setting phase to do tuning work should know what the actual
> degrees is, which is important for them to decide the sample window
> algorithm).
> 
> By looking into the two drivers who use set_phase/get_phase pair
> currently, they actually both don'e care what the actual degrees when
> they call clk_set_phase. I think that is because the drivers are used
> for specific platform which support 0~360 implicitly. But the situation
> is NOT always right for cross-platform drivers. So add some sort of
> round_phase API is probably sane ?
> 

Do you have such a platform or driver though? I'd rather not do
anything unless we actually need to.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-27  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-18  1:38 [PATCH v2] clk: check the actual phase if get_phase is provided Shawn Lin
2016-02-25 23:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26  1:21   ` Shawn Lin
2016-02-27  0:10     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-02-29  1:14       ` Shawn Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160227001042.GC28849@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox