From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] x86/setup: get ramdisk parameters only once
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:55:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227115546.GC16200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160226083741.GA12729@pd.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:
> > void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > {
> > + struct ramdisk ramdisk = {
> > + .start_addr = get_ramdisk_image(),
> > + .size = PAGE_ALIGN(get_ramdisk_size()),
> > + .reserve_ramdisk = true
> > + };
>
> More readable:
>
> struct ramdisk ramdisk = {
> .start_addr = get_ramdisk_image(),
> .size = PAGE_ALIGN(get_ramdisk_size()),
> .reserve_ramdisk = true,
> };
So I find it highly annoying that this review feedback was done by Boris, but not
implemented in v8 :-(
I'd much have preferred fewer iterations and more careful implementation, which
would have resulted in much less time wasted on the reviewer side...
Anyway, to stop this trainwreck I've fixed this (and a few other small details)
and applied the patch, but I'd also like to point out that from now on I'll stop
accepting trivial patches from serial trivial patches contributors that are not
part of some larger, more substantial work...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-27 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-26 7:31 [PATCH v7] x86/setup: get ramdisk parameters only once Alexander Kuleshov
2016-02-26 8:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-27 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-02-27 12:44 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160227115546.GC16200@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox