public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] x86/setup: get ramdisk parameters only once
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:44:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227124429.GA5337@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160227115546.GC16200@gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:55:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So I find it highly annoying that this review feedback was done by Boris, but not 
> implemented in v8 :-(

And I missed it when going over v8. :-(

FWIW, since recently I get the impression that people don't take review
feedback seriously. Starting to think, why even bother...

> I'd much have preferred fewer iterations and more careful implementation, which 
> would have resulted in much less time wasted on the reviewer side...

Agreed.

> Anyway, to stop this trainwreck I've fixed this (and a few other small details) 
> and applied the patch, but I'd also like to point out that from now on I'll stop 
> accepting trivial patches from serial trivial patches contributors that are not 
> part of some larger, more substantial work...

Good idea. ACK.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-27 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-26  7:31 [PATCH v7] x86/setup: get ramdisk parameters only once Alexander Kuleshov
2016-02-26  8:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-27 11:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-27 12:44     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160227124429.GA5337@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox