* libbabeltrace feature detection message
@ 2016-02-29 15:07 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-01 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2016-02-29 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa; +Cc: Wang Nan, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Jiri,
While testing a patch by Wang, that requires building with
libbabeltrace, I noticed that there are no feature detection message
telling that it was found successfully. The end result is the desired
one, it builds with babeltrace, but I wonder if we couldn't have the
[ok] line for it:
[acme@jouet linux]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/perf ; make LIBBABELTRACE=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin
make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf'
BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build
Auto-detecting system features:
... dwarf: [ on ]
... glibc: [ on ]
... gtk2: [ on ]
... libaudit: [ on ]
... libbfd: [ on ]
... libelf: [ on ]
... libnuma: [ on ]
... numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ]
... libperl: [ on ]
... libpython: [ on ]
... libslang: [ on ]
... libcrypto: [ on ]
... libunwind: [ on ]
... libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ]
... zlib: [ on ]
... lzma: [ on ]
... get_cpuid: [ on ]
... bpf: [ on ]
GEN /tmp/build/perf/common-cmds.h
CC /tmp/build/perf/fixdep.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/fixdep-in.o
<SNIP>
[acme@jouet linux]$ ldd ~/bin/perf | grep babel
libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 (0x00007fce5c405000)
libbabeltrace.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace.so.1 (0x00007fce5bd69000)
[acme@jouet linux]$
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: libbabeltrace feature detection message
2016-02-29 15:07 libbabeltrace feature detection message Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2016-03-01 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-01 12:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2016-03-01 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; +Cc: Jiri Olsa, Wang Nan, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:07:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> While testing a patch by Wang, that requires building with
> libbabeltrace, I noticed that there are no feature detection message
> telling that it was found successfully. The end result is the desired
> one, it builds with babeltrace, but I wonder if we couldn't have the
> [ok] line for it:
well, we removed it, because the latest version if libbabeltrace pkg
perf needs wasn't present in common distros.. so for most users that
would print 'OFF' as a status.. that might have changed now, dont know
anyway, for libbabeltrace and other in FEATURE_TESTS_EXTRA it's not possible
to print their status easily at the moment, because the status isn't known at
the time tools/build/Makefile.feature is included in config/Makefile
I'll check if we can reorg the code a little to get the full status at the end
jirka
>
>
> [acme@jouet linux]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/perf ; make LIBBABELTRACE=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin
> make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf'
> BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build
>
> Auto-detecting system features:
> ... dwarf: [ on ]
> ... glibc: [ on ]
> ... gtk2: [ on ]
> ... libaudit: [ on ]
> ... libbfd: [ on ]
> ... libelf: [ on ]
> ... libnuma: [ on ]
> ... numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ]
> ... libperl: [ on ]
> ... libpython: [ on ]
> ... libslang: [ on ]
> ... libcrypto: [ on ]
> ... libunwind: [ on ]
> ... libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ]
> ... zlib: [ on ]
> ... lzma: [ on ]
> ... get_cpuid: [ on ]
> ... bpf: [ on ]
>
> GEN /tmp/build/perf/common-cmds.h
> CC /tmp/build/perf/fixdep.o
> LD /tmp/build/perf/fixdep-in.o
> <SNIP>
> [acme@jouet linux]$ ldd ~/bin/perf | grep babel
> libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 (0x00007fce5c405000)
> libbabeltrace.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace.so.1 (0x00007fce5bd69000)
> [acme@jouet linux]$
>
>
> - Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: libbabeltrace feature detection message
2016-03-01 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2016-03-01 12:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2016-03-01 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa; +Cc: Jiri Olsa, Wang Nan, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Em Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:51:24PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:07:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > While testing a patch by Wang, that requires building with
> > libbabeltrace, I noticed that there are no feature detection message
> > telling that it was found successfully. The end result is the desired
> > one, it builds with babeltrace, but I wonder if we couldn't have the
> > [ok] line for it:
>
> well, we removed it, because the latest version if libbabeltrace pkg
And we should keep it like that, I'm talking about something else.
> perf needs wasn't present in common distros.. so for most users that
> would print 'OFF' as a status.. that might have changed now, dont know
>
> anyway, for libbabeltrace and other in FEATURE_TESTS_EXTRA it's not possible
> to print their status easily at the moment, because the status isn't known at
> the time tools/build/Makefile.feature is included in config/Makefile
Ok, I guess this should then be the problem to solve, when possible,
i.e. what I am talking about is:
1. It should remain as is while the generally available babeltrace
library doesn't have what we need.
2. But, if we explicitely ask for it to be built, then it should do the
feature detection as usual, checking if what we asked it to do, to
enable building with libbabeltrace, is possible, if so, print:
babeltrace [ok]
:-)
> I'll check if we can reorg the code a little to get the full status at the end
Thanks!
> jirka
>
> >
> >
> > [acme@jouet linux]$ rm -rf /tmp/build/perf ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/perf ; make LIBBABELTRACE=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin
> > make: Entering directory '/home/acme/git/linux/tools/perf'
> > BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build
> >
> > Auto-detecting system features:
> > ... dwarf: [ on ]
> > ... glibc: [ on ]
> > ... gtk2: [ on ]
> > ... libaudit: [ on ]
> > ... libbfd: [ on ]
> > ... libelf: [ on ]
> > ... libnuma: [ on ]
> > ... numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ]
> > ... libperl: [ on ]
> > ... libpython: [ on ]
> > ... libslang: [ on ]
> > ... libcrypto: [ on ]
> > ... libunwind: [ on ]
> > ... libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ]
> > ... zlib: [ on ]
> > ... lzma: [ on ]
> > ... get_cpuid: [ on ]
> > ... bpf: [ on ]
> >
> > GEN /tmp/build/perf/common-cmds.h
> > CC /tmp/build/perf/fixdep.o
> > LD /tmp/build/perf/fixdep-in.o
> > <SNIP>
> > [acme@jouet linux]$ ldd ~/bin/perf | grep babel
> > libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace-ctf.so.1 (0x00007fce5c405000)
> > libbabeltrace.so.1 => /lib64/libbabeltrace.so.1 (0x00007fce5bd69000)
> > [acme@jouet linux]$
> >
> >
> > - Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-01 12:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-29 15:07 libbabeltrace feature detection message Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-01 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-01 12:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).