From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760652AbcCECdl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:33:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:33628 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760033AbcCECdj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:33:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:33:35 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Roger Quadros Cc: tony@atomide.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, javier@dowhile0.org, fcooper@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms Message-ID: <20160305023335.GP55664@google.com> References: <1455916548-3441-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <56D470E8.4070106@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56D470E8.4070106@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 19/02/16 23:15, Roger Quadros wrote: > > Hi, > > > > @Tony > > Patches 15 and 24 are new and will need your review. > > I've modified patch 22 to include the new am335x boards introduced since v4.4. > > > > Patches are based on top of omap-for-v4.6/dt so that the DT changes apply cleanly. > > > > @Brian > > If you can Ack the MTD related changes we can push the series (excluding DT patches) > > to an immutable branch and you can then pull it into l2-mtd.git > > Gentle ping on this. Thanks. I think this series looks a lot better. I don't think I have any fundamental issues with the MTD stuff, aside from the one comment about the 'reg' property. If we get a satisfactory answer for that (and you fix the small stuff), then: Acked-by: Brian Norris (That's also presuming the relevant players are all on board with the DT "ABI" breakage. But I think your old binding really needed a fixup, so the warning might be sufficient.) Brian