public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:mm/pkeys] mm/pkeys: Fix siginfo ABI breakage caused by new u64 field
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 17:52:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160305165234.GY6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160305135006.GA15928@gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> A more workable method would be to have a test .c file that includes all UAPI 
> structures in existence and defines a variable out of every single one, and then 
> generates a list of sizeof() values or so. But even that isn't perfect: a 
> structure might shift some fields forward, into a pre-existing hole, without 
> changing the sizeof? We'd need a list of all field offsets in all structures to be 
> really sure, and that's nasty.

pahole has such logic, right?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-05 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01 12:54 [PATCH] [v4] x86, pkeys: fix siginfo ABI breakage from new field Dave Hansen
2016-03-03 15:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-03 16:53 ` [tip:mm/pkeys] mm/pkeys: Fix siginfo ABI breakage caused by new u64 field tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2016-03-03 17:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-05 13:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-05 16:52       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-03-06 18:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-07  8:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-05 14:03 ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160305165234.GY6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox