From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753870AbcCHBIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:08:12 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:63892 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753436AbcCHBH5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:07:57 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,554,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="904433838" Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:06:42 -0800 From: Jacob Pan To: Jacob Pan Cc: LKML , Linux PM , Rafael Wysocki , Thomas Gleixner , Srinivas Pandruvada , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls and misc clean up Message-ID: <20160307170642.31af8b7e@icelake> In-Reply-To: <1456349498-1527-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> References: <1456349498-1527-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:31:34 -0800 Jacob Pan wrote: > Changes since v5: > - Split changes into seprate patches. No code change. > Changes since V4: > - Deleted unnecessary cpumask_any_and() call, assign first > cpu as lead Changes since V3: > - Avoid for_each_online_cpu() search for per package MSR > access. This is achieved by tracking a per package lead cpu via > cpumask_xx() calls. (suggested by Thomas Gleixner > ) > - Add direct reference of RAPL package for each RAPL > domain. > > Jacob Pan (4): > cpumask: export cpumask_any_but > powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls > powercap/rapl: add package reference per domain > powercap/rapl: track lead cpu per package > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 220 > ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > lib/cpumask.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 115 > insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) > Hi Thomas, Do you have more comments? Thanks, Jacob