linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry: Improve system call entry comments
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:27:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308102755.GA5407@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVo42mw6xd8an0F37A+cx-vPje0Xmgh0-coG7N1J7a8kA@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> > >  ENTRY(entry_INT80_32)
> >
> > entry_INT80_32() is only used on pure 32-bit kernels, 64-bit kernels use
> > entry_INT80_compat(). So the above text should not talk about 64-bit programs, as
> > they can never trigger this specific entry point, right?
> >
> 
> 64-bit programs can and sometimes do trigger this entry point. [...]

How can 64-bit programs trigger entry_INT80_32? It's only ever set on 32-bit 
kernels:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
        set_system_trap_gate(IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR, entry_INT80_32);
        set_bit(IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR, used_vectors);
#endif

> [...]  It does a 32-bit syscall regardless of the caller's bitness, but it 
> returns back to the caller's original context, whatever it was.

That's true of INT $0x80, but I'm talking about the entry point: AFAICS 
entry_INT80_32 can only ever execute on 32-bit kernels.

We don't even build the entry_32.S::entry_INT80_32 entry point on 64-bit kernels:

obj-y                           := entry_$(BITS).o [...]

> 
> > So I'd change the explanation to something like:
> >
> > > + * This entry point is active on 32-bit kernels and can thus be used by 32-bit
> > > + * programs to perform 32-bit system calls. (Programs running on 64-bit
> > > + * kernels executing INT $0x80 will land on another entry point:
> > > + * entry_INT80_compat. The ABI is identical.)
> 
> I like the part in parentheses.

So the part in parentheses conflict with your above statement :)

What I wanted to say with this:

> > > + * This entry point is active on 32-bit kernels and can thus be used by 32-bit
> > > + * programs to perform 32-bit system calls. (Programs running on 64-bit
> > > + * kernels executing INT $0x80 will land on another entry point:
> > > + * entry_INT80_compat. The ABI is identical.)

... is what it says: that entry_INT80_32 is only active on 32-bit kernels, running 
32-bit programs, performing 32-bit system calls.

Programs running on 64-bit kernels can use INT $0x80 as well, but will land on 
another, different, 64-bit kernel specific entry point.

What am I missing?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-08 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-06 17:39 [PATCH] x86/entry: Improve system call entry comments Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-07  8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-07 16:34   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-08 10:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-08 18:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-08 18:45         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 18:47           ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-08 18:50             ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 18:59               ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-08 19:11                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-07 17:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 10:27     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-08 18:29       ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160308102755.GA5407@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).