From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751787AbcCIFbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:31:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:33112 "EHLO mail-pf0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752198AbcCIFas (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:30:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:30:33 +0700 From: Lee Jones To: Kieran Bingham Cc: Grant Likely , Javier Martinez Canillas , Samuel Ortiz , Wolfram Sang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Message-ID: <20160309053033.GM13692@x1> References: <1441972564-9621-1-git-send-email-kieranbingham@gmail.com> <20151009211636.GA1481@katana> <20160308042221.GD13692@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 08 Mar 2016, Kieran Bingham wrote: > On 8 Mar 2016 11:22, "Lee Jones" wrote: > > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Kieran Bingham wrote: > > > > > Hi Wolfram, > > > > > > On 9 October 2015 at 22:16, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > > > As said to Kieran personally in Dublin, I want a verification that all > > > > binding methods still work, especially runtime instantiation for > drivers > > > > without i2c_device_ids. > > > > > > Ok, I should be able to find some time to look at that this week. > > > > > > > Also, for the last patch, a verification should > > > > be done if the drivers i2c_device_id hasn't been used meanwhile. > > > > > > I'll see what I can do ... > > > > > > > I'd also like to see 'probe_new' instead of 'probe2' for the new > function > > > > name. That should be it. > > > > > > Ok, obviously this is only a temporary naming so I don't mind either > way, > > > I'll do a rename for the next version > > > > > > I've also just found a compile failure to fix up on !CONFIG_OF, this > > > can make its way into the respin. > > > > I still don't see this upstream. What's the latest status? > > Needs correct testing: > "verification that all binding methods still work, especially runtime > instantiation for drivers without i2c_device_ids." > > Actually I rebased this set last week. I was going to try and see if I can > test in qemu. Just need to work out how to load DT fragments at runtime. Sounds like an over-the-top solution. Can't you just modprobe some modules? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog