linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:35:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310173535.GA15940@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E168FB.3080509@redhat.com>


* Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Now, more and more features depend on eger xsave, e.g, fpu, mpx and 
> > protection-key, maybe it is the time to rename eager-fpu to eager-xsave?
> 
> Yeah, that could be possible.  You can propose it to Ingo Molnar (CCed).
>  If you change it in the general purpose kernel code, KVM will of course follow 
> suit.

So we have this queued up for v4.6:

  58122bf1d856 x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all CPUs

and if all goes fine with that then the plan for v4.7 is to remove the lazy FPU 
restore code altogether.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 11:44 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paolo Bonzini
     [not found]   ` <CA+3C=r-NVn__gPVdYRSypzjfejRBgB4VVY5OpckS2QGjXnUu2Q@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-11 12:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-24 13:06       ` Yang Zhang
2016-03-24 13:07         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13  9:47           ` Yang Zhang
2016-05-10 12:38             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: remove eager_fpu field of struct kvm_vcpu_arch Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 12:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-10 12:30   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 17:35     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-10 17:38       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160310173535.GA15940@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).