From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: ds1685: actually spin forever in poweroff error path
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:48:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310224801.GP9868@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25c2e99dc116c666a05e641082a2690c05c09a23.1457362965.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
On 07/03/2016 at 09:03:02 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote :
> objtool reports the following warnings:
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.o: warning: objtool: ds1685_rtc_work_queue()+0x0: duplicate frame pointer save
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.o: warning: objtool: ds1685_rtc_work_queue()+0x3: duplicate frame pointer setup
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.o: warning: objtool: ds1685_rtc_work_queue()+0x0: frame pointer state mismatch
>
> The warning message needs to be improved, but what it really means in
> this case is that ds1685_rtc_poweroff() has a possible code path where
> it can actually fall through to the next function in the object code,
> ds1685_rtc_work_queue().
>
> The bug is caused by the use of the unreachable() macro in a place which
> is actually reachable. That causes gcc to assume that the printk()
> immediately before the unreachable() macro never returns, when in fact
> it does. So gcc places the printk() at the very end of the function's
> object code. When the printk() returns, the next function starts
> executing.
>
> The surrounding comment and printk message state that the code should
> spin forever, which explains the unreachable() statement. However the
> actual spin code is missing.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Applied, thanks.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201603060005.PHCyifJr%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2016-03-07 15:03 ` [PATCH] rtc: ds1685: actually spin forever in poweroff error path Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-07 21:30 ` Joshua Kinard
2016-03-07 22:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-10 22:48 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160310224801.GP9868@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox