From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:12:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160312151209.GA9356@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160312150809.GA7015@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > > 486 cores like Intel Quark support only the very old, legacy x87 FPU
> > > (FSAVE/FRSTOR, CPUID bit FXSR is not set). And our FPU code wasn't
> > > handling the saving and restoring there properly. First, Andy Shevchenko
> > > reported a splat:
> > >
> > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 823 at arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:163 fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160
> > >
> > > which was us trying to execute FXRSTOR on those machines even though
> > > they don't support it.
> > >
> > > After taking care of that, Bryan O'Donoghue reported that a simple FPU
> > > test still failed because we weren't initializing the FPU state properly
> > > on those machines.
> >
> > Obvious Ack to the patch, along with a "how did this ever work
> > before?" comment..
>
> So the window for 'real' breakage was relatively short: this is an older bug but
> only became a serious bug with the following upcoming commit:
>
> 58122bf1d856 x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all CPUs
And the reason for that is:
void fpu__clear(struct fpu *fpu)
{
WARN_ON_FPU(fpu != ¤t->thread.fpu); /* Almost certainly an anomaly */
if (!use_eager_fpu() || !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)) {
/* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */
fpu__drop(fpu);
} else {
if (!fpu->fpstate_active) {
fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
user_fpu_begin();
}
copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs();
}
}
i.e. we only execute the buggy sequence in the !eager_fpu case - and old FPUs were
not eager-FPU, which hid the bug.
The other bug:
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void __init fpu__init_system_gene
* Set up the legacy init FPU context. (xstate init might overwrite this
* with a more modern format, if the CPU supports it.)
*/
- fpstate_init_fxstate(&init_fpstate.fxsave);
+ fpstate_init(&init_fpstate);
was also hidden by the fact that it only affects eagerfpu case - but all previous
eagerfpu bootups were for post-XSAVE CPUs.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-12 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 10:46 Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-10 12:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 12:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 13:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 15:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 15:45 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 16:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 17:15 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 19:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 1:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 10:50 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11 1:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-11 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:02 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11 11:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:32 ` [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-11 22:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 22:07 ` Dave Hansen
2016-03-11 22:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 17:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-12 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 12:04 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-12 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 15:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-22 22:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-03-12 15:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 15:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-12 15:16 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Fix eager-FPU " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160312151209.GA9356@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox