public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akinobu.mita@gmail.com,
	jack@suse.cz, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
	peter@hurleysoftware.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:21:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160314012157.GA8074@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457692627-14076-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

Hello Byungchul,

Sorry, I'll make sure I Cc you next time. Jan Kara's updated patch set

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145787625506342

it's quite close to what you have done in this patch, but Jan's
patch also solves a number of more likely to happen cases.

have time to take a look?

the lock debug patch in your series is different. can we settle
down async printk first and then return to it? it's not so simple...


On (03/11/16 19:37), Byungchul Park wrote:
[..]
>  int printk_deferred(const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
>  	va_list args;
>  	int r;
>  
>  	preempt_disable();
> +
>  	va_start(args, fmt);
> -	r = vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
> +	r = vprintk_deferred(fmt, args);
>  	va_end(args);
> +	printk_pending_output();
>  
> -	__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
> -	irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
>  	preempt_enable();
>  
>  	return r;

vprintk_deferred() does vprintk_emit()->{spin_lock()} again? cosole_lock() is
moved out of sight, but logbug_lock is still there. wouldn't this (in the worst
case) result in endless loop after all? sorry if I'm missing something.

	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-14  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11 10:37 [PATCH v6 0/2] Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park
2016-03-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Factor out buffering and irq work queuing in printk_deferred Byungchul Park
2016-03-14  1:21   ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2016-03-14  4:45     ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make printing of spin_dump() deferred to avoid a deadlock Byungchul Park
2016-03-14  1:37   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-14  2:30     ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-14  2:40       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-14  4:17         ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-16  2:06           ` Byungchul Park
2016-03-18  5:55 ` [PATCH] lib/spinlock_debug: Prevent a unnecessary recursive spin_dump() Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160314012157.GA8074@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox