From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754325AbcCOAL2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:11:28 -0400 Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:56976 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753248AbcCOAL0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:11:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:11:21 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Nicholas Mc Guire Cc: Patrick McHardy , Jozsef Kadlecsik , "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait Message-ID: <20160315001121.GA24820@salvia> References: <1457955542-2377-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1457955542-2377-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > The spin_lock()/spin_unlock() is synchronizing on the > nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock which is equivalent to > spin_unlock_wait() but the later should be more efficient. Applied, thanks.