From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>,
Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>,
Scott Ashcroft <scott.ashcroft@talk21.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pat: Fix boot crash when 1GB pages are not supported by cpu
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:03:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315160318.GF4559@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457951581-27353-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:33:01AM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> Scott reports that with the new separate EFI page tables he's seeing
> the following error on boot, caused by setting reserved bits in the
> page table structures (fault code is PF_RSVD | PF_PROT),
>
> swapper/0: Corrupted page table at address 17b102020
> PGD 17b0e5063 PUD 1400000e3
> Bad pagetable: 0009 [#1] SMP
>
> On first inspection the PUD is using a 1GB page size (_PAGE_PSE) and
> looks fine but that's only true if support for 1GB PUD pages
> ("pdpe1gb") is present in the cpu.
>
> Scott's Intel Celeron N2820 does not have that feature and so the
> _PAGE_PSE bit is reserved. Fix this issue by making the 1GB mapping
> code in conditional on "cpu_has_gbpages".
>
> This issue didn't come up in the past because the required mapping for
> the faulting address (0x17b102020) will already have been setup by the
> kernel in early boot before we got to efi_map_regions(), but we no
> longer use the standard kernel page tables during EFI calls.
>
> Reported-by: Scott Ashcroft <scott.ashcroft@talk21.com>
> Tested-by: Scott Ashcroft <scott.ashcroft@talk21.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
> Cc: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> index 14c38ae80409..fcf8e290740a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int populate_pud(struct cpa_data *cpa, unsigned long start, pgd_t *pgd,
> /*
> * Map everything starting from the Gb boundary, possibly with 1G pages
> */
> - while (end - start >= PUD_SIZE) {
> + while (cpu_has_gbpages && end - start >= PUD_SIZE) {
> set_pud(pud, __pud(cpa->pfn << PAGE_SHIFT | _PAGE_PSE |
> massage_pgprot(pud_pgprot)));
>
> --
Yap, looks ok to me as a minimal fix:
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
As a future cleanup, I'd carve out the sections of populate_pud() which
map the stuff up to the Gb boundary and the trailing leftover into a
helper, say, __populate_pud_chunk() or so which goes and populates with
smaller sizes, i.e., 2M and 4K and the lower levels.
This'll make populate_pud() more readable too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 10:33 [GIT PULL] EFI urgent fix for v4.6 queue Matt Fleming
2016-03-14 10:33 ` [PATCH] x86/mm/pat: Fix boot crash when 1GB pages are not supported by cpu Matt Fleming
2016-03-15 16:03 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-03-16 8:03 ` [tip:efi/core] x86/mm/pat: Fix boot crash when 1GB pages are not supported by the CPU tip-bot for Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160315160318.GF4559@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hertzog@debian.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rogershimizu@gmail.com \
--cc=scott.ashcroft@talk21.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox