From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] block: fix bio merge checks when virt_boundary is set
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:03:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315160321.GA30533@localhost.lm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458055076-2175-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:17:56PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> The reason of the slowdown is the fact that bios don't get merged and we
> end up sending many short requests to the host. My investigation led me to
> the following code (__bvec_gap_to_prev()):
>
> return offset ||
> ((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
>
> Here is an example: we have two bio_vec with the following content:
> bprv.bv_offset = 512
> bprv.bv_len = 512
>
> bnxt.bv_offset = 1024
> bnxt.bv_len = 512
>
> bprv.bv_page == bnxt.bv_page
> virt_boundary is set to PAGE_SIZE-1
>
> The above mentioned code will report that a gap will appear if we merge
> these two (as offset = 1024) but this doesn't look sane. On top of that,
> we have the following optimization in bio_add_pc_page():
>
> if (page == prev->bv_page &&
> offset == prev->bv_offset + prev->bv_len) {
> prev->bv_len += len;
> bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> goto done;
> }
This part sounds odd. Why is a filesystem using bio_add_pc_page? Shouldn't
these go through "bio_add_page" instead? That already has an optimization
to combine bio's within the same page.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 15:17 [PATCH RFC] block: fix bio merge checks when virt_boundary is set Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-15 16:03 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-03-16 10:17 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-16 15:40 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-16 16:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-16 22:38 ` Keith Busch
2016-03-17 11:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-03-17 16:39 ` Keith Busch
2016-03-18 2:59 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-30 13:07 ` Ming Lei
2016-04-20 13:48 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-12-15 14:03 ` Dexuan Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160315160321.GA30533@localhost.lm.intel.com \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox