From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: asm9260: remove incorrect __init/__exit annotations
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:30:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316093008.GB20227@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458078287-586232-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi,
On 15/03/2016 at 22:44:31 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> The probe and remove callbacks of the platform driver are marked __init
> and __exit, respectively. However, this is not a correct way to annotate
> them, as it will result in those sections to be discarded at link time
> or after boot, while we can actually call them again based on manual
> unbinding, or deferred probing.
>
> Kbuild warns about the problem:
>
> WARNING: drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.o(.data+0x0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable asm9260_rtc_driver to the function .init.text:asm9260_rtc_probe()
>
I'm not sure why this was not caught before. I'm not building all the
platform but that one should have been easy to find...
> This removes the annotations, so we no longer branch into missing
> code and avoid the warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 125e550fd257 ("rtc: add Alphascale asm9260 driver")
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> index 14e08c4c1a01..355fdb97a006 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops asm9260_rtc_ops = {
> .alarm_irq_enable = asm9260_alarm_irq_enable,
> };
>
> -static int __init asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ err_return:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int __exit asm9260_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int asm9260_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> --
> 2.7.0
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 21:44 [PATCH] rtc: asm9260: remove incorrect __init/__exit annotations Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-16 9:30 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2016-03-16 9:33 ` Oleksij Rempel
2016-03-18 23:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160316093008.GB20227@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox