From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S936623AbcCQRkn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:40:43 -0400
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:40480 "EHLO
	mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S935835AbcCQRkl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:40:41 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:40:19 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20160317174019.GJ2566@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1458235427-3856540-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UD9uuWeujuEvWfkY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1458235427-3856540-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
X-Cookie: Walk softly and carry a megawatt laser.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: fix documentation to match code
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--UD9uuWeujuEvWfkY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> I think this got lost when you fixed the code for 4.6, and the current
> documentation still has the initial text you wrote back in January
> that doesn't actually explain what happens.=20

It didn't get lost, you never actually submitted the patch.  You did
paste something into a reply to a message but never sent anything with a
signoff.  I'm definitely not going to apply anything that doesn't get
sent with a signoff.

--UD9uuWeujuEvWfkY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW6uwCAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQMosH+wd9r76JAZh0RU3Xc4R/av7q
g2fLiIjq0CHlSzQ0IZ6+nEh0sp1vU5vSZ/wcUpDkrps9oMQOdoENuFDMbC7JueuJ
8o/lk8LhJHqI5b6ADr+ydAy0w2GTNnSb+QjQuu17LkfEjIHPX6Nsaci8L41ErN+0
wC9U4qMSplVAywDpX+OqZILmD1T3lmZRF44Xz8u2kcLtDH5kGqb4odKKLtVOp+gF
0ipBe0eAXWvn59vBHM3TlY6B2FUqoZdicrHVJ+S8ozYXSuSFNhUUaLhpwlXBmw3X
zoS9I9TOj8DTZZMYX2AITKhHuyLwjXd1HOMPlIrnfSdtchufivQklnENJd2Yv4U=
=GcfX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UD9uuWeujuEvWfkY--