From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Prevent NULL pointer deref in calibrate_delay_is_known()
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:17:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160318101749.GL1681@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603180843270.3978@nanos>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Subject: x86/tsc: Prevent NULL pointer deref in calibrate_delay_is_known()
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:35:29 +0100
>
> The topology_core_cpumask is used to find a neighbour cpu in
> calibrate_delay_is_known(). It might not be allocated at the first invocation
> of that function on the boot cpu, when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is set.
>
> The mask is allocated later in native_smp_prepare_cpus. As a consequence the
> underlying find_next_bit() call dereferences a NULL pointer.
>
> Add a proper check to prevent this.
>
> Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
> Fixes: c25323c07345 "x86/tsc: Use topology functions"
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
I have tested the current upstream kernel (9dffdb38d) and was able to
reproduce the bug. I then added this patch on top and it fixes the
problem for me. Therefore:
Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Thanks, Rich.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1306,11 +1306,15 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
> unsigned long calibrate_delay_is_known(void)
> {
> int sibling, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + struct cpumask *mask = topology_core_cpumask(cpu);
>
> if (!tsc_disabled && !cpu_has(&cpu_data(cpu), X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
> return 0;
>
> - sibling = cpumask_any_but(topology_core_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
> + if (!mask)
> + return 0;
> +
> + sibling = cpumask_any_but(mask, cpu);
> if (sibling < nr_cpu_ids)
> return cpu_data(sibling).loops_per_jiffy;
> return 0;
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 7:48 [PATCH] x86/tsc: Prevent NULL pointer deref in calibrate_delay_is_known() Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-18 10:17 ` Richard W.M. Jones [this message]
2016-03-18 13:54 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160318101749.GL1681@redhat.com \
--to=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox