* [linux-next:master 4720/12950] net/core/dst_cache.c:31:6: sparse: symbol 'dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2016-03-18 15:27 kbuild test robot
2016-03-18 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next] net: dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set() can be static kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2016-03-18 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: kbuild-all, netdev, linux-kernel
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: 5e3497cca281616e7930b74a0076b7324dcc2057
commit: 607f725f6f7d5ec3759fbc16224afb60e2152a5b [4720/12950] net: replace dst_cache ip6_tunnel implementation with the generic one
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 607f725f6f7d5ec3759fbc16224afb60e2152a5b
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> net/core/dst_cache.c:31:6: sparse: symbol 'dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/core/dst_cache.c:42:18: sparse: symbol 'dst_cache_per_cpu_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [RFC PATCH linux-next] net: dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set() can be static 2016-03-18 15:27 [linux-next:master 4720/12950] net/core/dst_cache.c:31:6: sparse: symbol 'dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot @ 2016-03-18 15:27 ` kbuild test robot 2016-03-18 21:45 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: kbuild test robot @ 2016-03-18 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: kbuild-all, netdev, linux-kernel Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> --- dst_cache.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dst_cache.c b/net/core/dst_cache.c index 3938f3f..554d364 100644 --- a/net/core/dst_cache.c +++ b/net/core/dst_cache.c @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ struct dst_cache_pcpu { }; }; -void dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set(struct dst_cache_pcpu *dst_cache, - struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie) +static void dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set(struct dst_cache_pcpu *dst_cache, + struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie) { dst_release(dst_cache->dst); if (dst) @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ void dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set(struct dst_cache_pcpu *dst_cache, dst_cache->dst = dst; } -struct dst_entry *dst_cache_per_cpu_get(struct dst_cache *dst_cache, - struct dst_cache_pcpu *idst) +static struct dst_entry *dst_cache_per_cpu_get(struct dst_cache *dst_cache, + struct dst_cache_pcpu *idst) { struct dst_entry *dst; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] net: dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set() can be static 2016-03-18 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next] net: dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set() can be static kbuild test robot @ 2016-03-18 21:45 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2016-03-18 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fengguang.wu; +Cc: pabeni, kbuild-all, netdev, linux-kernel From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:27:28 +0800 > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Looks good, applied, thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-18 21:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-03-18 15:27 [linux-next:master 4720/12950] net/core/dst_cache.c:31:6: sparse: symbol 'dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot 2016-03-18 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next] net: dst_cache_per_cpu_dst_set() can be static kbuild test robot 2016-03-18 21:45 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox