From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933137AbcCRPcE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:32:04 -0400
Received: from [198.137.202.9] ([198.137.202.9]:36839 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932494AbcCRPcB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:32:01 -0400
Message-Id: <20160318152802.407611377@infradead.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.61-1
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:28:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, dzickus@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] random debug patches
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

The only relation between these patches is that they are the result of me
trying to hunt down fail. Other than that they're unrelated and can be
independently applied.