public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, stefan.stanacar@intel.com,
	octavian.purdila@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com, mohamed.abbas@intel.com,
	constantin.musca@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] efi: Introduce EFI bootloader control driver
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:15:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160318161505.GU2619@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458295910-26557-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com>

On Fri, 18 Mar, at 12:11:50PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> From: Matt Gumbel <matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com>
> 
> This driver intercepts system reboot requests and populates the
> LoaderEntryOneShot EFI variable with the user-supplied reboot
> argument. EFI bootloaders such as Gummiboot will consume this
> variable and use it to control which OS is booted next.
> 
> We use this with Android where reboot() tells the kernel that
> we want to boot into recovery or other non-default OS environment.
> 
> It is the bootloader's job to guard against this variable being
> uninitialzed or containing invalid data, and just boot normally
> if that is the case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Gumbel <matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mohamed Abbas <mohamed.abbas@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca <constantin.musca@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 	* updated Makefile after changing source name from efibc.c -> efi-bc.c
> 	to comply with naming rules in drivers/firmware/efi/
> 
>  drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig  |  11 ++
>  drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-bc.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/efi-bc.c

Why does this require a driver? Why is it not possible to solve this
problem by creating the variable in userspace before invoking
reboot(2)?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-18 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-18 10:11 [PATCH v2] efi: Introduce EFI bootloader control driver Daniel Baluta
2016-03-18 11:22 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-18 12:46 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-18 16:15 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-03-18 19:18   ` Stanacar, Stefan
2016-03-24 14:47     ` Matt Fleming
2016-03-24 16:15       ` Stanacar, Stefan
2016-03-29 12:53         ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160318161505.GU2619@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=constantin.musca@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com \
    --cc=mohamed.abbas@intel.com \
    --cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
    --cc=stefan.stanacar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox