From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 01:59:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160320015947.GA17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyO_HXDqo7Lh_OSUJJXWdQc4ccOFeky31r+QwUsyN1bDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 06:55:21PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Preparations of parallel lookups (the remaining main obstacle is the
> > need to move security_d_instantiate(); once that becomes safe, the rest will
> > be a matter of rather short series local to fs/*.c) + preadv2/pwritev2 series
> > from Christoph + assorted fixes.
>
> So this:
>
> > Al Viro:
> > replace d_add_unique() with saner primitive
>
> ends up conflicting with commit d9dfd8d74168 ("NFSv4: Fix a dentry
> leak on alias use").
>
> >From what I can tell, your version doesn't have the leak issue, so my
> merge resolution is to just take your new code as-is, but I'd ask you
> to double-check my logic.
>
> (I haven't pushed out the merge yet, it's still going through my build
> test. Soon, but I guess you can just take a look at that dentry leak
> commit regardless).
It does contain an equivalent of the leak fix, and yes, resolution should
be "take the variant from vfs.git in the area of conflict".
In fact, I was just pondering whether to send a followup describing the
conflict resolution (== take the variant from vfs.git in the area of
conflict) or leave it be as too trivial. Should've sent...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-20 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-20 1:44 [git pull] vfs.git Al Viro
2016-03-20 1:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-20 1:59 ` Al Viro [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-17 5:55 Al Viro
2016-11-11 6:05 Al Viro
2016-11-11 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-11 18:06 ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-11-12 3:36 ` Yan, Zheng
2016-10-11 3:07 Al Viro
2016-05-16 3:32 Al Viro
2016-05-16 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-17 6:27 ` Al Viro
2016-05-17 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-17 20:11 ` Al Viro
2015-04-24 20:40 Al Viro
2014-12-10 19:13 [GIT PULL] vfs.git Al Viro
2014-12-11 16:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-12-11 18:06 ` Al Viro
2014-12-11 18:34 ` Al Viro
2014-11-05 13:57 [git pull] vfs.git Al Viro
2014-11-02 5:58 Al Viro
2014-10-26 3:04 Al Viro
2014-04-12 12:40 Al Viro
2014-04-13 18:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-11 16:30 Al Viro
2013-11-13 14:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-15 3:34 Al Viro
2012-12-21 0:21 Al Viro
2012-06-01 16:56 Al Viro
2012-06-01 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-01 17:48 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160320015947.GA17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).