From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v6 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:20:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160323132011.GG4512@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160323092541.GC5522@pathway.suse.cz>
On Wed 23-03-16 10:25:41, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-03-23 10:24:43, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (03/22/16 17:36), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > - /* cpu currently holding logbuf_lock in this function */
> > > > - static unsigned int logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX;
> > > > + bool in_panic = console_loglevel == CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_MOTORMOUTH;
> > >
> > > I am just looking at the printk in NMI patchset and I will need to
> > > deal with the panic state as well. I am not sure if this detection
> > > is secure.
> > >
> > > This console level is set also by kdb_show_stack()
> > > and kdb_dumpregs(). I am not sure how this kdb stuff works
> > > and if it affects normal kernel but...
> > >
> > > Anyway, it seems that many locations detects the panic situation
> > > via the variable oops_in_progress. It has another advantage
> > > that it can be easily checked and we would not need any extra
> > > variable here.
> >
> > oops_in_progress is not my favorite global. and we can't rely on it
> > in async printk.
> >
> > in panic() we have
> >
> > console_verbose();
> > bust_spinlocks(1); << sets to one
> >
> > pr_emerg("Kernel panic - not syncing: %s\n", buf);
> > smp_send_stop();
> >
> > bust_spinlocks(0); << sets it back to zero
> >
> > console_flush_on_panic();
> >
> > there are several issues here.
> > - first, panic_cpu does not see oops_in_progress right after bust_spinlocks(0).
> > thus all printk issued from panic_cpu can go via async printk.
>
> I though that it actually could be an advantage. console_verbore() is
> called also by oops_begin() and it does not need to be fatal. But you
> are right that it does not need to be the righ approach.
If we oops, I want printk to be sync regardless whether the machine is able
to live afterwards or not. You never know in advance... That's why I've
chosen the console_verbose() trigger and I still think it is better than
oops_in_progress or special console_panic() trigger.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 17:25 [RFC][PATCH v6 0/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-21 17:25 ` [RFC][PATCH v6 1/2] " Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-22 13:11 ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-22 14:04 ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-23 0:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-23 8:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-23 10:04 ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-24 2:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-22 16:36 ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-23 1:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-23 9:25 ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-23 13:20 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-03-23 14:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-23 14:41 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-21 17:25 ` [RFC][PATCH v6 2/2] printk: Make wake_up_klogd_work_func() async Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-22 6:49 ` [RFC][PATCH v6 0/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Jan Kara
2016-03-22 7:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-22 8:15 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-23 19:40 ` Pavel Machek
2016-04-24 5:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-24 13:35 ` Pavel Machek
2016-04-24 15:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160323132011.GG4512@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox