linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, brgerst@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, dsahern@gmail.com,
	dvlasenk@redhat.com, jolsa@redhat.com, luto@amacapital.net,
	mingo@kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, vincent.weaver@maine.edu,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/cqm: Fix CQM handling of grouping events into a cache_group
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:14:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160323201438.GH11676@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1603211109210.25124@vshiva-Udesk>

On Mon, 21 Mar, at 11:14:37AM, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> 
> 
> Before MBM , the below condition was never hit because we had only one event ?
> 
> -       if (a->hw.target == b->hw.target)
> +       if (a->hw.target == b->hw.target) {
> +               b->hw.is_group_event = true;
> 
> We are trying to address this for cases where different MBM(local or total)
> and cqm events are grouped into one RMID.
 
I can't test these changes, so I'm only working from memory, but I
seem to recall that this condition is hit if monitoring simultaneously
from two invocations of perf. It's also possible to have pid/tid
groups overlapping, and that needs to be handled.

> Which is the case which led to duplicate values ?

Good question. Try monitoring a multithread process with these changes
and see if you get duplicate values reported.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 23:32 [PATCH V6 0/6] Intel memory b/w monitoring support Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-10 23:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/perf/intel/cqm: Fix cqm handling of grouping events into a cache_group Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-21  9:51   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/cqm: Fix CQM " tip-bot for Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-21 14:57     ` Matt Fleming
2016-03-21 18:14       ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-23 20:14         ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-03-23 22:49           ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-10 23:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/perf/intel/cqm: Fix cqm memory leak and notifier leak Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-21  9:51   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/cqm: Fix CQM " tip-bot for Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-10 23:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/mbm: Intel Memory B/W Monitoring enumeration and init Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-21  9:52   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/mbm: Add " tip-bot for Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-10 23:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/mbm: Memory bandwidth monitoring event management Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-11 19:26   ` Tony Luck
2016-03-21  9:52     ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/mbm: Add memory " tip-bot for Tony Luck
2016-03-10 23:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/mbm: RMID Recycling MBM changes Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-21  9:53   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/mbm: Implement RMID recycling tip-bot for Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-21 15:09     ` Matt Fleming
2016-03-21 18:27       ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-23 20:59         ` Matt Fleming
2016-03-10 23:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/mbm: Add support for MBM counter overflow handling Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-11 19:26   ` Tony Luck
2016-03-21  9:53     ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/mbm: " tip-bot for Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-11 22:54 ` [PATCH V6 0/6] Intel memory b/w monitoring support Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 23:22   ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-11 23:25     ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-03-11 23:45   ` Luck, Tony
2016-03-12  1:56   ` Luck, Tony
2016-03-12  7:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-12 16:14       ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160323201438.GH11676@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).