From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<axboe@fb.com>, <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"4.2+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't make BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS too big
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:01:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160329220053.GA1716708@devbig084.prn1.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160329211833.GA18532@infradead.org>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:18:33PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:42:33AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > bio_alloc_bioset() allocates bvecs from bvec_slabs which can only
> > allocate maximum 256 bvec (eg, 1M for 4k pages). We can't bump
> > BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS to exceed this value otherwise bio_alloc_bioset will
> > fail.
>
> This might be true, but it's not a good enough reason. Request based
> driver couldn't care less about the limits of bio_alloc_bioset.
>
> It seems the bug is that somone (would be great to know whoe exactly)
> passes a too large value to bio_alloc_bioset. And given that we still
> have bio_add_page around for actually adding pages to a bio it seems
> like the proper fix would be to simply clamp down the actual allocation
> and segment limit inside bio_alloc_bioset. Which would also help to
> eventually remove code doing just that in tons of callers.
The problem is bcache allocates a big bio (with bio_alloc). The bio is
split with blk_queue_split, but it isn't split to small size because
queue limit. the bio is cloned later in md, which uses bio_alloc_bioset.
bio_alloc_bioset itself can't allocate big size bio.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-29 16:42 [PATCH] block: don't make BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS too big Shaohua Li
2016-03-29 21:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-29 22:01 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2016-03-30 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-30 16:50 ` Shaohua Li
2016-03-30 17:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-31 0:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2016-03-30 1:39 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-30 2:27 ` Shaohua Li
2016-03-30 12:13 ` Ming Lei
2016-03-30 17:07 ` Shaohua Li
2016-03-31 0:49 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160329220053.GA1716708@devbig084.prn1.facebook.com \
--to=shli@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox