public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/qrwlock: Allow multiple spinning readers
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 21:53:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160401195329.GO3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160401164742.GD3991@arm.com>

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > +#define smp_cond_load_acquire(ptr, cond_expr)	({		\
> > +	typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr);				\
> > +	typeof(*ptr) VAL;					\
> 
> It's a bit grim having a magic variable name, but I have no better
> suggestion.

Right; we had this discussion and this is the best we could come up
with.

lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzZA9EB3hFptSpdmeMOifeM5BWQGOW+ib7SLvyMTETzaA@mail.gmail.com

> > +	for (;;) {						\
> > +		VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR);			\
> > +		if (cond_expr)					\
> > +			break;					\
> > +		cpu_relax();					\
> > +	}							\
> > +	smp_rmb(); /* ctrl + rmb := acquire */			\
> > +	VAL;							\
> > +})
> 
> Can you stick some #ifndef guards around this, please?

Oh sure; I'll even compile and boot it when I find a moment ;-)

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-20  3:21 [PATCH] locking/qrwlock: Allow multiple spinning readers Waiman Long
2016-03-20 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-22  2:21   ` Waiman Long
2016-03-29 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 22:12   ` Waiman Long
2016-04-01 10:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 10:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 10:41       ` Will Deacon
2016-04-01 10:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 11:43           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 16:47             ` Will Deacon
2016-04-01 19:53               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160401195329.GO3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox