From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753536AbcDCXtA (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:49:00 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO12.lge.com ([156.147.23.52]:59417 "EHLO lgeamrelo12.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752308AbcDCXs7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:48:59 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 165.244.98.150 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.223.161 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:49:03 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Andrew Morton CC: Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: reclaim highmem zone if buffer_heads is over limit Message-ID: <20160403234903.GA5833@bbox> References: <1459497658-22203-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <20160401080350.GB8916@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160401131458.e31d45f56a98c62669b35e3d@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160401131458.e31d45f56a98c62669b35e3d@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on LGEKRMHUB07/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016/04/04 08:48:56, Serialize by Router on LGEKRMHUB07/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016/04/04 08:48:56, Serialize complete at 2016/04/04 08:48:56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:14:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:03:50 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Fri 01-04-16 17:00:58, Minchan Kim wrote: > > [...] > > > [2] commit 5acbd3bfc93b ("mm, oom: rework oom detection") > > > > I didn't look a tht patch yet but wanted to note that this sha is most > > probably from linux-next and won't be stable. Also this patch will most > > likely see some changes in future so making changes on top which should > > go in independetly will likely just complicate things. > > Yes, we'll need two patches please. One to fix 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm: > vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()") (which is in > mainline) and a second to clean up -mm's "mm, oom: rework oom detection". Andrew, Michal Thanks. I just sent out it as separate patch.