[PATCH] Staging: android: timed_gpio: fixed bare use of 'unsigned'

[PATCH] Staging: android: timed_gpio: fixed bare use of 'unsigned'

[Shyam Saini]

'unsigned int gpio' is added in place of 'unsigned gpio'

Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/android/timed_gpio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/timed_gpio.c b/drivers/staging/android/timed_gpio.c
index 914fd10..8926b3f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/timed_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/timed_gpio.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct timed_gpio_data {
 	struct timed_output_dev dev;
 	struct hrtimer timer;
 	spinlock_t lock;
-	unsigned gpio;
+	unsigned int gpio;
 	int max_timeout;
 	u8 active_low;
 };
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] Staging: android: timed_gpio: fixed bare use of 'unsigned'

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:12:28PM +0530, Shyam Saini wrote:
> 'unsigned int gpio' is added in place of 'unsigned gpio'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/android/timed_gpio.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

This file is no longer in linux-next, please always work against that
tree, otherwise you duplicate work others have already done.

sorry,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] Staging: android: timed_gpio: fixed bare use of 'unsigned'

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:02:54PM +0530, Shyam Saini wrote:
> hi,
> Sorry for duplicate work, actually i was following http://kernelnewbies.org/
> FirstKernelPatch .
> I updated the repository, then i watched this video  and finally submitted the
> duplicate patch.
> 
> As you said, I should work against linux -next.
> So, Now, i'm following https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html.
> May you  please tell me whether i'm on right track or not?

Yes, that sounds correct, you can also read
Documentation/development_process/ to see all of the details as to how
linux-next ties into all of the other subsystem trees.

good luck!

greg k-h