From: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
jeyu@redhat.com, eugene.shatokhin@rosalab.ru,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pmladek@suse.cz
Subject: Re: Bug with paravirt ops and livepatches
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:48:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406134833.GA12961@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1604061406080.30748@pobox.suse.cz>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:09:01PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Chris J Arges wrote:
>
> > I think this approach needs more thought and my code has bug(s).
>
> And indeed there is...
>
> long (*__kvm_arch_vm_ioctl)(struct file *filp, unsigned long ioctl, unsigned long arg) = NULL;
>
> Use a different name than __kvm_arch_vm_ioctl and (ideally) make it
> static.
>
> kallsyms_lookup_name("__kvm_arch_vm_ioctl") returns the address of this
> variable from the patch module.
>
> Miroslav
>
Well that was the bug, I was really stumped why it was giving me a wierd
address for a function. Once I changed my pointer name to something else it
worked, so there was no difference to these approaches. I also had to modify
the symbol lookup to happen in the livepatch so we ensure that the module is
loaded in this case and not get a NULL deref.
The fixed code is here:
http://people.canonical.com/~arges/livepatch_issue/livepatch_kvm_arch_vm_ioctl.works.2/
This out of tree patch doesn't have the same failure as building a patch with
kpatch-build which is what we expect since it doesn't have livepatch relocs. In
addition I tested with the kvm module loaded _after_ the livepatch module and
no failure was observed.
--chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-29 12:05 Bug with paravirt ops and livepatches Chris J Arges
2016-03-29 13:01 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-03-29 13:05 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-01 15:01 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-01 15:46 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-01 16:01 ` Chris J Arges
2016-04-01 19:07 ` Chris J Arges
2016-04-01 19:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-04 16:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-04 17:58 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-05 13:07 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-05 13:53 ` Evgenii Shatokhin
2016-04-05 14:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-05 19:19 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-06 8:30 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-06 8:43 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-06 9:09 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-06 17:23 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-06 16:55 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-05 23:27 ` Chris J Arges
2016-04-06 9:09 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-06 10:38 ` Chris J Arges
2016-04-06 12:09 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-06 13:48 ` Chris J Arges [this message]
2016-04-06 14:17 ` Miroslav Benes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160406134833.GA12961@canonical.com \
--to=chris.j.arges@canonical.com \
--cc=eugene.shatokhin@rosalab.ru \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox