From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757044AbcDHDyw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:54:52 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:34129 "EHLO mail-lf0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046AbcDHDyv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:54:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:54:45 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Lee Jones Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Chanwoo Choi , Arnd Bergmann , Javier Martinez Canillas , Kukjin Kim , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Message-ID: <20160408035445.GA9532@kozik-lap> References: <1459756459-22061-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160407132947.GB3323@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160407132947.GB3323@x1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 04 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > The consumer of max77693 regulators on Trats2 board (samsung-usb2-phy > > driver) supports deferred probing so the max77693 main MFD driver can be > > built now as a module. This gives more flexibility and removes manual > > ordering of init calls. > > > > Suggested-by: Paul Gortmaker > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > --- > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 14 ++------------ > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > I assume this can be taken immediately and doesn't depend on anything > external to the set? > > For my own reference: > Acked-by: Lee Jones Hi, Yes, this can be taken as is. Only second patch (changing defconfig) depends on this. I can take the second patch through samsung tree but that would require a tag/branch with this... which looks like an overkill. So maybe you would take both? Best regards, Krzysztof