Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/rtmutex/deadline: Fix a PI crash for deadline tasks

Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-08T08:32:09Z

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:04:07PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> On 2016/04/07 at 02:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > I would suggest doing the rt_mutex_postunlock() thing as a separate
> > patch, it has some merit outside of these changes and reduces the total
> > amount of complexity in this patch.
>
> I think the code change is necessary , as it avoids the invalid task_struct
> access issue introduced by PATCH1.
>
> Do you mean just making the code refactor using rt_mutex_postunlock()
> as a separate patch? or do I miss something?

This, a separate patch that comes before this one.

But no need to send that until you've received word from Thomas.