From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, adityakali@google.com,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cgroup namespaces: add a 'nsroot=' mountinfo field
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:50:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413185033.GH3676@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160413184639.GA29483@mail.hallyn.com>
Hello, Serge.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:46:39PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> It's not a leak of any information we're trying to hide. I realize
> something like 8 years have passed, but I still basically go by the
> ksummit guidance that containers are ok but the kernel's first priority
> is to facilitate containers but not trick containers into thinking
> they're not containerized. So long as the container is properly set
> up, I don't think there's anything the workload could do with the
> nsroot= info other than *know* that it is in a ns cgroup.
>
> If we did change that guidance, there's a slew of proc info that we
> could better virtualize :)
I see. I'm just wondering because the information here seems a bit
gratuituous. Isn't the only thing necessary telling whether the root
is bind mounted or namescoped? Wouldn't simple "nsroot" work for that
purpose?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-13 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 23:41 [RFC PATCH] cgroup namespaces: add a 'nsroot=' mountinfo field Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-29 1:12 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-30 18:58 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-29 13:58 ` Tycho Andersen
2016-03-29 20:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-30 17:21 ` [PATCH] cgroup mount: ignore nsroot= Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-30 18:09 ` Tycho Andersen
2016-04-13 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH] cgroup namespaces: add a 'nsroot=' mountinfo field Tejun Heo
2016-04-13 18:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-04-13 18:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-04-13 19:01 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-04-13 19:12 ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-13 23:31 ` Aditya Kali
2016-04-13 23:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-04-14 4:04 ` [PATCH] " Serge E. Hallyn
2016-04-14 14:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-04-14 15:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-04-14 16:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-04-14 16:38 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-04-14 16:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-04-15 15:50 ` Aditya Kali
2016-04-15 16:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160413185033.GH3676@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=adityakali@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox