linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:45:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414164550.GC6247@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414153727.6387.96381.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:41:35AM -0700, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> This patch series removes the write() interface for user access in favor of an
> ioctl() based approach. This is in response to the complaint that we had
> different handlers for write() and writev() doing different things and expecting
> different types of data. See:

I think we should wait on applying these patches until we globally sort out
what to do with the rdma uapi.

It just doesn't make alot of sense for drivers to have their own personal
char devices. :(

A second char dev for the eeprom? How is that OK? Why aren't you using
the I2C layer for this?

Why is there a snoop interface in here? How is that not something that
belongs in a the core code?

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 15:41 [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] IB/hfi1: Export drivers user sw version via sysfs Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-18 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] IB/hfi1: Remove unused user command Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-18 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] IB/hfi1: Add ioctl() interface for user commands Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write(), use ioctl() for user cmds Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] IB/hfi1: Add trace message in user IOCTL handling Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] IB/hfi1: Consolidate IOCTL defines Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] IB/hfi1: Move eprom to its own device Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 16:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2016-04-14 17:48   ` [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Ira Weiny
2016-04-14 18:05     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-14 18:42       ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 18:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-15  4:01     ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 16:17       ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-15 17:30         ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 17:34           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-15 17:44             ` Woodruff, Robert J
2016-04-15 21:03               ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 17:46             ` Hefty, Sean
2016-04-15 21:23             ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 23:28               ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-16  6:09                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-16 15:29                   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-15 23:37               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-16  6:00                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-16 19:19                   ` Al Viro
2016-04-18 12:00                     ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 17:52   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 18:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-20 20:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-22 18:38       ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-26 15:23         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-18 13:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-18 17:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-18 18:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-19  3:45         ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-19 18:40           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-19 17:38         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160414164550.GC6247@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).