linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:42:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414184200.GA10416@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414180540.GA12554@obsidianresearch.com>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:05:40PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>There are some pretty obvious paths to make this saner that could only
>be a few weeks away, we haven't even had the first conversations
>yet. I think you are completely wrong there is no 'line of sight'
>
>It certainly can't be years.

Does fixing the current write()/writev() problem have any real impact on how 
we proceed for the "1 char dev to rule them all" idea?

>There is some rational for a very driver specific thing, but EEPROM
>and snoop? Seriously?

That's the thing, I think these are very driver specific [1]. I'm not dead 
set that the eprom needs to be its own device, it made sense to me, but if 
others feel the handling should be back in the hfi1 char device I'm fine 
with that.

As for the snoop stuff, perhaps that would be better in rdmavt?

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=146065638629146&w=2

-Denny

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 15:41 [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] IB/hfi1: Export drivers user sw version via sysfs Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-18 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] IB/hfi1: Remove unused user command Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-18 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] IB/hfi1: Add ioctl() interface for user commands Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write(), use ioctl() for user cmds Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] IB/hfi1: Add trace message in user IOCTL handling Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] IB/hfi1: Consolidate IOCTL defines Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 15:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] IB/hfi1: Move eprom to its own device Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-14 17:48   ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-14 18:05     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-14 18:42       ` Dennis Dalessandro [this message]
2016-04-14 18:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-15  4:01     ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 16:17       ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-15 17:30         ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 17:34           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-15 17:44             ` Woodruff, Robert J
2016-04-15 21:03               ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 17:46             ` Hefty, Sean
2016-04-15 21:23             ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-15 23:28               ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-16  6:09                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-16 15:29                   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-15 23:37               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-16  6:00                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-04-16 19:19                   ` Al Viro
2016-04-18 12:00                     ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 17:52   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-14 18:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-20 20:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-22 18:38       ` Dennis Dalessandro
2016-04-26 15:23         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-18 13:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-18 17:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-18 18:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-19  3:45         ` Ira Weiny
2016-04-19 18:40           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-19 17:38         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160414184200.GA10416@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com \
    --to=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).