From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
javier@dowhile0.org, fcooper@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:19:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160415161950.GT5995@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160415180531.15d790d2@bbrezillon>
* Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> [160415 09:06]:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:41:40 -0700
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Well the rules are that if something agreed to be immutable, then
> > it will never get redone. And the immutable branch should be based
> > on the absolute minimal set of patches against some earlier tag,
> > usually -rc1 is a good one. This avoids other tree to need to pull
> > in a huge amount of changes from other trees just to avoid merge
> > conflicts.
>
> How would you do it in this particular case. Say I have to provide you
> with an immutable branch, it should only contain Roger's patches, right?
Well ideally it would be just minimal NAND related changes
branch against v4.6-rc1. Then if Roger has a dependency to
that, Roger can pull it in.
Then Roger would make a branch for the GPMC changes against
your minimal NAND branch.
Then if there were non-trivial merge conflicts, I could pull
in Roger's GPMC branch as needed.
But in this case, it seems you can just merge everything via
the NAND tree and problem solved.
> But this also means this immutable branch has to be pulled into my
> nand/next branch before all other changes touching the same set of
> files, which in turn means that I'll have to rebase and push -f my
> nand/next branch (which I'd like to avoid).
Yeah let's not do rebases, there should be no need for it.
> Or should I just pull this immutable branch in my current nand/next and
> let you pull the same immutable branch in omap-soc. I mean, would this
> prevent conflicts when our branches are merged into linux-next, no
> matter the order.
Ideally just one or more branches with just minimal changes in
them against -rc1. But you may have other dependencies in
your NAND tree so that may no longer be doable :) Usually if
I merge something that may need to get merged into other
branches, I just apply them into a separate branch against -rc1
to start with, then merge that branch in.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 10:08 [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Add platform data Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Add gpmc timings and settings to " Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Introduce GPMC to NAND interface Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Add GPMC-NAND ops to get writebufferempty status Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Implement IRQ domain for NAND IRQs Roger Quadros
2016-04-11 14:52 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] mtd: nand: omap: Use gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops() to get NAND registers Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] mtd: nand: omap: Switch to using GPMC-NAND ops for writebuffer empty check Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] mtd: nand: omap: Copy platform data parameters to omap_nand_info data Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] mtd: nand: omap: Clean up device tree support Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] mtd: nand: omap: Update DT binding documentation Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Prevent mapping into 1st 16MB Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Move device tree binding to correct location Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Support general purpose input for WAITPINs Roger Quadros
2016-04-11 15:00 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Reserve WAITPIN if needed for WAIT monitoring Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Support WAIT pin edge interrupts Roger Quadros
2016-04-11 15:03 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] memory: omap-gpmc: Prevent GPMC_STATUS from being accessed via gpmc_regs Roger Quadros
2016-04-07 10:08 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] mtd: nand: omap2: Implement NAND ready using gpiolib Roger Quadros
2016-04-11 15:04 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-13 21:25 ` [PATCH v6 00/17] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms Tony Lindgren
2016-04-15 9:34 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-15 10:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 10:54 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-15 11:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 11:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 15:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-15 16:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 16:19 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-04-16 8:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-18 12:31 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-18 12:52 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-18 13:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-18 13:48 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-18 14:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-18 14:39 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-18 14:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-19 12:46 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-19 12:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-19 20:11 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-20 8:58 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-20 14:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-19 13:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-19 14:26 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-19 14:49 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160415161950.GT5995@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=fcooper@ti.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).