From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] mtd: nand: read ECC algorithm from the new field
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:58:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160416095807.112d2f59@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460750052-16285-11-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:54:10 +0200
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now we have all drivers properly setting this new field we can start
> using it and proceed with deprecating NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index e1f3cf8..ffd1b32 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -4154,7 +4154,7 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> /*
> * If no default placement scheme is given, select an appropriate one.
> */
> - if (!mtd->ooblayout && (ecc->mode != NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH)) {
> + if (!mtd->ooblayout && ecc->algo != NAND_ECC_BCH) {
Should be:
if (!mtd->ooblayout && ecc->algo == NAND_ECC_SOFT &&
ecc->algo != NAND_ECC_BCH) {
Otherwise you're also taking the NAND_ECC_HW + NAND_ECC_BCH into
account.
> switch (mtd->oobsize) {
> case 8:
> case 16:
> @@ -4248,51 +4248,59 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> ecc->algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
>
> case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
> - ecc->calculate = nand_calculate_ecc;
> - ecc->correct = nand_correct_data;
> - ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_swecc;
> - ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
> - ecc->write_page = nand_write_page_swecc;
> - ecc->read_page_raw = nand_read_page_raw;
> - ecc->write_page_raw = nand_write_page_raw;
> - ecc->read_oob = nand_read_oob_std;
> - ecc->write_oob = nand_write_oob_std;
> - if (!ecc->size)
> - ecc->size = 256;
> - ecc->bytes = 3;
> - ecc->strength = 1;
> - break;
> -
> case NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH:
Shouldn't we drop this case?
> - if (!mtd_nand_has_bch()) {
> - WARN(1, "CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH not enabled\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto err_free;
> - }
> - ecc->calculate = nand_bch_calculate_ecc;
> - ecc->correct = nand_bch_correct_data;
> - ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_swecc;
> - ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
> - ecc->write_page = nand_write_page_swecc;
> - ecc->read_page_raw = nand_read_page_raw;
> - ecc->write_page_raw = nand_write_page_raw;
> - ecc->read_oob = nand_read_oob_std;
> - ecc->write_oob = nand_write_oob_std;
> - /*
> - * Board driver should supply ecc.size and ecc.strength values
> - * to select how many bits are correctable. Otherwise, default
> - * to 4 bits for large page devices.
> - */
> - if (!ecc->size && (mtd->oobsize >= 64)) {
> - ecc->size = 512;
> - ecc->strength = 4;
> - }
> + switch (ecc->algo) {
Please put this logic in a sub-function, nand_scan_tail() is already
quite long and hard to read, let's try to not define sub switch-case
blocks inside existing ones.
> + case NAND_ECC_HAMMING:
> + ecc->calculate = nand_calculate_ecc;
> + ecc->correct = nand_correct_data;
> + ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_swecc;
> + ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
> + ecc->write_page = nand_write_page_swecc;
> + ecc->read_page_raw = nand_read_page_raw;
> + ecc->write_page_raw = nand_write_page_raw;
> + ecc->read_oob = nand_read_oob_std;
> + ecc->write_oob = nand_write_oob_std;
> + if (!ecc->size)
> + ecc->size = 256;
> + ecc->bytes = 3;
> + ecc->strength = 1;
> + break;
> + case NAND_ECC_BCH:
> + if (!mtd_nand_has_bch()) {
> + WARN(1, "CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH not enabled\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> + ecc->calculate = nand_bch_calculate_ecc;
> + ecc->correct = nand_bch_correct_data;
> + ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_swecc;
> + ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
> + ecc->write_page = nand_write_page_swecc;
> + ecc->read_page_raw = nand_read_page_raw;
> + ecc->write_page_raw = nand_write_page_raw;
> + ecc->read_oob = nand_read_oob_std;
> + ecc->write_oob = nand_write_oob_std;
> + /*
> + * Board driver should supply ecc.size and ecc.strength
> + * values to select how many bits are correctable.
> + * Otherwise, default to 4 bits for large page devices.
> + */
> + if (!ecc->size && (mtd->oobsize >= 64)) {
> + ecc->size = 512;
> + ecc->strength = 4;
> + }
>
> - /* See nand_bch_init() for details. */
> - ecc->bytes = 0;
> - ecc->priv = nand_bch_init(mtd);
> - if (!ecc->priv) {
> - WARN(1, "BCH ECC initialization failed!\n");
> + /* See nand_bch_init() for details. */
> + ecc->bytes = 0;
> + ecc->priv = nand_bch_init(mtd);
> + if (!ecc->priv) {
> + WARN(1, "BCH ECC initialization failed!\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN(1, "Unsupported ECC algorithm!\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto err_free;
> }
> @@ -4478,7 +4486,7 @@ void nand_release(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>
> - if (chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH)
> + if (chip->ecc.algo == NAND_ECC_BCH)
Again, should be:
if (chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT &&
chip->ecc.algo == NAND_ECC_BCH)
> nand_bch_free((struct nand_bch_control *)chip->ecc.priv);
>
> mtd_device_unregister(mtd);
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-16 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1460750052-16285-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 01/12] mtd: nand: bf5xx: set ECC algorithm explicitly Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 02/12] mtd: nand: davinci: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 03/12] avr32: set Atmel NAND " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-16 7:38 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-16 12:58 ` Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 04/12] mtd: nand: atmel: set " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-16 7:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 05/12] CRIS v32: nand: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 06/12] staging: mt29f_spinand: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 07/12] mtd: nand: set ECC algorithm to Hamming on fallback Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 08/12] mtd: nand: hisi504: set ECC algorithm based on DT info Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-16 7:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 09/12] mtd: nand: fsmc: validate ECC setup by checking algorithm directly Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 20:23 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-15 20:24 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-15 20:43 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 10/12] mtd: nand: read ECC algorithm from the new field Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-16 7:58 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-04-16 8:11 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-17 16:27 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 16:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-17 16:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-17 16:57 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 11/12] of: mtd: drop support for NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH as "soft_bch" mapping Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-16 8:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-16 8:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-15 19:54 ` [PATCH 12/12] mtd: mtd: drop NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH enum value Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-17 17:10 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 19:01 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <1460913104-27388-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 01/11] mtd: nand: bf5xx: set ECC algorithm explicitly Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 02/11] mtd: nand: davinci: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 03/11] mtd: nand: atmel: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 04/11] CRIS v32: nand: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 05/11] staging: mt29f_spinand: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 06/11] mtd: nand: set ECC algorithm to Hamming on fallback Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 07/11] mtd: nand: hisi504: set ECC algorithm based on DT info Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 08/11] mtd: nand: fsmc: validate ECC setup by checking algorithm directly Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 09/11] mtd: nand: read ECC algorithm from the new field Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 18:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 10/11] of: mtd: drop support for NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH as "soft_bch" mapping Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 17:11 ` [PATCH V2 11/11] mtd: mtd: drop NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH enum value Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <1460926387-9563-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
2016-04-17 20:52 ` [PATCH V3 01/11] mtd: nand: bf5xx: set ECC algorithm explicitly Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:52 ` [PATCH V3 02/11] mtd: nand: davinci: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:52 ` [PATCH V3 03/11] mtd: nand: atmel: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 04/11] CRIS v32: nand: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-21 20:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-21 20:44 ` Mikael Starvik
2016-04-22 7:26 ` Jesper Nilsson
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 05/11] staging: mt29f_spinand: " Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-21 20:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-22 2:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 06/11] mtd: nand: set ECC algorithm to Hamming on fallback Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 07/11] mtd: nand: hisi504: set ECC algorithm based on DT info Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 08/11] mtd: nand: fsmc: validate ECC setup by checking algorithm directly Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 09/11] mtd: nand: read ECC algorithm from the new field Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 10/11] of: mtd: drop support for NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH as "soft_bch" mapping Rafał Miłecki
2016-04-17 20:53 ` [PATCH V3 11/11] mtd: mtd: drop NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH enum value Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160416095807.112d2f59@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox