* Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
@ 2016-04-15 23:52 Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-16 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2016-04-15 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fweisbec
Cc: linux-kernel, josh, rostedt, mathieu.desnoyers, jiangshanlai,
mingo
Hello, Frederic,
One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
RCU source code to make it easier to find things. Given our discussion
yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
expedited grace-period code. I have a couple of commits doing this in
-rcu, and would like your opinion. Worthwhile, or should I revert those
two commits?
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
2016-04-15 23:52 Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h Paul E. McKenney
@ 2016-04-16 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-16 15:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2016-04-16 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney
Cc: linux-kernel, josh, rostedt, mathieu.desnoyers, jiangshanlai,
mingo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello, Frederic,
>
> One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
> RCU source code to make it easier to find things. Given our discussion
> yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
> expedited grace-period code. I have a couple of commits doing this in
> -rcu, and would like your opinion. Worthwhile, or should I revert those
> two commits?
It's definetly worth having a look! And it might help me eventually understand
that expedited grace period thing :-)
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
2016-04-16 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2016-04-16 15:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-17 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2016-04-16 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker, Paul E. McKenney
Cc: linux-kernel, josh, rostedt, Lai Jiangshan, mingo
----- On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Hello, Frederic,
>>
>> One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
>> RCU source code to make it easier to find things. Given our discussion
>> yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
>> expedited grace-period code. I have a couple of commits doing this in
>> -rcu, and would like your opinion. Worthwhile, or should I revert those
>> two commits?
>
> It's definetly worth having a look! And it might help me eventually understand
> that expedited grace period thing :-)
Moving the expedited handling into its own files indeed
seems to better organize the sub-parts of RCU. That seems
like a good idea.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
2016-04-16 15:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
@ 2016-04-17 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2016-04-17 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, linux-kernel, josh, rostedt, Lai Jiangshan,
mingo
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 03:29:09PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> Hello, Frederic,
> >>
> >> One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
> >> RCU source code to make it easier to find things. Given our discussion
> >> yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
> >> expedited grace-period code. I have a couple of commits doing this in
> >> -rcu, and would like your opinion. Worthwhile, or should I revert those
> >> two commits?
> >
> > It's definetly worth having a look! And it might help me eventually understand
> > that expedited grace period thing :-)
And for me to document it. ;-)
> Moving the expedited handling into its own files indeed
> seems to better organize the sub-parts of RCU. That seems
> like a good idea.
Sounds good, will give it a try. If it works well, I might do the same
for other sub-parts of RCU.
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-17 2:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-15 23:52 Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-16 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-16 15:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-17 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox