From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753911AbcDSKyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:54:14 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:53680 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752723AbcDSKyN (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:54:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:53:57 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: PC Liao Cc: "tiwai@suse.de" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , srv_heupstream , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Koro Chen =?utf-8?B?KOmZs+aAnee/sCk=?= , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Message-ID: <20160419105357.GR3217@sirena.org.uk> References: <1461061984.28704.8.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvlH2BAVfmx8aXCn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461061984.28704.8.camel@mtksdaap41> X-Cookie: Tomorrow, you can be anywhere. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: Applied "ASoC: mediatek: Add second I2S on mt8173-rt5650 machine driver" to the asoc tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GvlH2BAVfmx8aXCn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:33:04PM +0800, PC Liao wrote: > Thanks for your approval. > But this patch depends on [1]. > I think it also needs to apply [1], otherwise this patch will build > fail. > Or, do I need to upload new version again? > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5671961/ ("ASoC: core: export > snd_soc_get_dai_name") Ugh, dropped. Please put administritive stuff like this after the --- as covered in SubmittingPatches, that helps it get noticed. What it looks like you should be doing here is putting this in a subnode for capture. --GvlH2BAVfmx8aXCn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXFg5EAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQRgsH/iizQgEHCFxRTNu1X2BzdFai y87U+Ay+CyqvNSJUbu7LRqBANKF2FgGmO/UnHZbHFwjKUnLKBjwkLMOxgay2/jDw EaaHV2Ks1zxBTwtaHnK78AwFrzaMUOJOPBNxO9yJnmuKzZFEQmvu2hYsO4W1gVkq QjGl62mbj3vnsrKIJgvZBqZNg4rQZDo6kLmHY6l0yU/utBH2X8Enfig5eCB3cPQc s0ChMC0taDg5aeZueDMLUbYE+W3bkwWcR8qdWa5O2hibA1I/PsyacV+sFbsDl63P Kx1JzOtR2970l0VfvWXS/49rLEf4O5x0FoZAWcqvWoiwWy52l4CLBpF2Bc3SZpI= =5qXk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvlH2BAVfmx8aXCn--