From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Skylake PSys support
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:59:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420135945.GY3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460930581-29748-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 03:02:59PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Skylake processor supports a new set of RAPL registers for controlling
> entire SoC instead of just CPU package called PSys. This change adds
> support in two sub systems:
>
> x86/perf: Adds basic support for Skylake RAPL and PSys support
>
> powercap/rapl: A new platform domain to the current power capping Intel
> RAPL driver.
> Srinivas Pandruvada (2):
> perf/x86/intel/rapl: support Skylake RAPL domains
> powercap: intel_rapl: PSys support
>
> arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 2 ++
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
These two patches depend on one another, right? Because the first patch
adds the MSR the second patch uses?
How should we go about merging this? The perf-rapl stuff normally goes
through tip while the powercap stuff goes through Rafael's tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 22:02 [PATCH v4 0/2] Skylake PSys support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] perf/x86/intel/rapl: support Skylake RAPL domains Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 15:54 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-23 12:55 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Support " tip-bot for Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] powercap: intel_rapl: PSys support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-28 10:26 ` [tip:perf/core] powercap, perf/x86/intel/rapl: Add " tip-bot for Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-20 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Skylake " Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-21 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-21 14:48 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160420135945.GY3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).