linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Add missing Haswell model
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420153816.GD3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460907809-11897-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Added one missing Haswell model.

Indeed, but when I compare with the table in events/intel/core.c I find
we also miss one Broadwell (86) model.

Would the below be correct for that?

---
 arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 7c56b985c9f6..f9129a85928a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
@@ -739,16 +739,21 @@ static const struct intel_rapl_init_fun knl_rapl_init __initconst = {
 
 static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] __initconst = {
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(42, snb_rapl_init),	/* Sandy Bridge */
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(45, snbep_rapl_init),	/* Sandy Bridge-EP */
+
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(58, snb_rapl_init),	/* Ivy Bridge */
-	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(63, hsx_rapl_init),	/* Haswell-Server */
-	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(79, hsx_rapl_init),	/* Broadwell-Server */
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(62, snbep_rapl_init),	/* IvyTown */
+
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(60, hsw_rapl_init),	/* Haswell */
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(63, hsx_rapl_init),	/* Haswell-Server */
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(69, hsw_rapl_init),	/* Haswell-Celeron */
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(70, hsw_rapl_init),	/* Haswell GTe3 */
+
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(61, hsw_rapl_init),	/* Broadwell */
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(71, hsw_rapl_init),	/* Broadwell-H */
-	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(45, snbep_rapl_init),	/* Sandy Bridge-EP */
-	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(62, snbep_rapl_init),	/* IvyTown */
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(79, hsx_rapl_init),	/* Broadwell-Server */
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(86, hsx_rapl_init),	/* Broadwell Xeon D */
+
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(87, knl_rapl_init),	/* Knights Landing */
 	{},
 };

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-17 15:43 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Add missing Haswell model Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-20 17:58   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-23 12:53 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Srinivas Pandruvada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160420153816.GD3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).