From: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@coreos.com>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: Always NUL terminate ucs2_as_utf8
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:13:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421151343.GA3763@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160421121827.GE2829@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 01:18:27PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> ( Good Lord, I hate doing string manipulation in C )
(yep)
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr, at 03:25:32PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >
> > So, "len" does not include the room for the terminating NUL-byte here.
> > When "len" is passed to ucs2_as_utf8(), with the proposed patch applied,
> > a NUL byte will be produced in "name", but it will be at the price of a
> > genuine character from the input variable name.
>
> Right, and this is a problem because we're trying to keep the names
> consistent between efivarfs and the EFI variable data. Force
> NUL-terminating the string is wrong, because if you have no room for
> the NUL the caller should check for that. Sadly none do.
>
> On the flip-side, passing around non-NUL terminated strings is just
> begging for these kinds of issues to come up.
>
> The fact is that the callers of ucs2_as_utf8() are passing it the
> wrong 'len' argument. We want a NUL-terminated utf8 string and we're
> passing a NUL-terminated ucs2 string. We should tell ucs2_as_utf8() it
> has enough room to copy the NUL.
>
> Wouldn't this work (minus the return value checking)?
I agree with your analysis, and your patch looks plausible.
--
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 8:37 [PATCH] lib: Always NUL terminate ucs2_as_utf8 Chris Wilson
2016-04-20 9:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-04-20 9:41 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-20 12:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-04-20 13:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-04-21 12:18 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-21 15:13 ` Peter Jones [this message]
2016-04-21 16:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-04-22 18:52 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-25 10:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-04-20 14:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421151343.GA3763@redhat.com \
--to=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).