public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] documentation: ACQUIRE applies to loads, RELEASE applies to stores
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:14:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160422171422.GF3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160422143222.GU3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:41:49AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > For compound atomics performing both a load and a store operation, make
> > it clear that _acquire and _release variants refer only to the load and
> > store portions of compound atomic. For example, xchg_acquire is an xchg
> > operation where the load takes on ACQUIRE semantics.
> > 
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Queued, thank you both!

							Thanx, Paul

> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > index 3729cbe60e41..05f8011011be 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > @@ -464,6 +464,11 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties:
> >       This means that ACQUIRE acts as a minimal "acquire" operation and
> >       RELEASE acts as a minimal "release" operation.
> >  
> > +A subset of the atomic operations described in atomic_ops.txt have ACQUIRE
> > +and RELEASE variants in addition to fully-ordered and relaxed (no barrier
> > +semantics) definitions.  For compound atomics performing both a load and a
> > +store, ACQUIRE semantics apply only to the load and RELEASE semantics apply
> > +only to the store portion of the operation.
> >  
> >  Memory barriers are only required where there's a possibility of interaction
> >  between two CPUs or between a CPU and a device.  If it can be guaranteed that
> > -- 
> > 2.1.4
> > 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-22 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 10:41 [PATCH] documentation: ACQUIRE applies to loads, RELEASE applies to stores Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 17:14   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160422171422.GF3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox