From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751846AbcDWHWP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:22:15 -0400
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:23860 "EHLO
	aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751407AbcDWHWN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:22:13 -0400
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:21:57 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Bluetooth: ath3k: Silence uninitialized variable warning
Message-ID: <20160423072157.GD17913@mwanda>
References: <20160422100255.GE11398@mwanda>
 <20160423064745.GA4826@afzalpc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160423064745.GA4826@afzalpc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:17:45PM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > -	int err, pipe, len, size, count, sent = 0;
> > +	int len = 0;
> > +	int err, pipe, size, count, sent = 0;
> 
> Is there any particular reason to avoid more than 1 variable
> initialization in definition on a single line ?, like,
> 
> 	int err, pipe, size, count, sent = 0, len = 0;
> 
> have observed that none of your uninitialized variable warning fixes
> does as mentioned above.

That sort of initialization is slightly less readable...

regards,
dan carpenter